Hitchens on Powell
In the November/December issue of Foreign Policy, Christopher Hitchens pens a critique of Colin Powell’s tenure as Secretary of State. Hitchens’ criticisms, interestingly, are not dissimilar to what he had to say when Powell was first nominated. Perhaps his most valid criticism of Powell’s tenure is:
The official historian of the State Department has calculated that Powell will have traveled less than any secretary in more than three decades. His three immediate predecessors voyaged abroad an average of 45 percent more than him. “Shuttle diplomacy” may well have been overpromoted by Henry Kissinger, but a politique de presence has an importance of its own, and Powell should not forget that it was very largely his own personality—large, affable, calm, and, yes, originally Caribbean—that landed him the post to begin with. I myself doubt that a diplomatic “offensive” by Powell would have melted the heart of the Elysee, but he incurs criticism not for failing, but for not trying.
Essentially, Hitchens’ argument for trying hits directly at the heart of what diplomacy is supposed to be about. Trying when you don’t have to, trying even when you know that it is futile is what makes for great foreign policy. When viewed within the context of the old adage that “a diplomat is someone who can tell you to go to hell and make you feel happy to be on your way” even if we never got
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home